Reactivity of Oxidized Sulfidic Mine Tailings during Lime Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lime amendment is a common method for neutralizing the accumulated acidity and sequestering metals in oxidized mine tailings. This study assessed the reactivity of sulfide oxidation products during lime treatment of tailings samples from the Kam Kotia mine site in Timmins, Ontario. The contributions of several alkalinity consumption mechanisms to the lime requirements were compared. Methods involved lime treatment tests, multiple water extractions, sequential extractions, analytical scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffractometry. The majority of the alkalinity consumption was due to the reaction of water-insoluble Fe-oxyhydroxysulfate minerals (including K-jarosite, Na-jarosite, H-jarosite, and schwertmannite) with lime to form Fe-oxyhydroxides (including goethite) and gypsum. The cation exchange capacity of the oxidized tailings contributed a minor proportion to the alkalinity consumption. Measurements of water-soluble acidity underestimated lime requirements by more than 50% on average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".