Sperm–zona pellucida interaction involves a carbonyl reductase activity in the hamster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For successful fertilization to occur, the spermatozoa must transit through an egg-specific extracellular matrix or zona pellucida (zp) to reach and ultimately fuse with the oocyte plasma membrane. This process involves ligand-receptor recognition between the zp and the acrosomal cap of the sperm. The hamster sperm protein P26h, a receptor which is acquired during epididymal transit, has been suggested to act in sperm-zp binding. The cloning and characterization of the full-length cDNA-encoding hamster P26h revealed 85% identity with a porcine lung carbonyl reductase. To better understand the mechanism by which P26h interacts with zp proteins, we investigated carbonyl reductase activity during gamete interactions. In the present study, we show that specific inhibitors of carbonyl reductase such as diclofenac and phenylbutazone decreases sperm-zp binding without affecting the motility, progressivity or acrosome integrity of sperm. We also detected, and partly purified, carbonyl reductase activities from cauda epididymal sperm protein extract and this activity was associated with an enriched fraction of P26h. Removing P26h from the partly purified protein fractions by immunoaffinity chromatography led to the loss of carbonyl reductase activity. The findings that sperm-zp binding is blocked by carbonyl reductase inhibitors and that P26h is active in mature sperm suggest that P26h could play an important role in the fertilization process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".