MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064282342 · doi:10.1029/2001jc001288

Scotian Shelf crossovers during winter/spring 1999

2003· article· en· W2064282342 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Smith, Charles N. Flagg, Richard Limeburner, César Fuentes‐Yaco, Charles G. Hannah, Robert C. Beardsley, James D. Irish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineOceanographyBaroclinityMesoscale meteorologyEnvironmental scienceWind stressMooringAnnual cycleEkman transportWater massGeologyClimatologyUpwelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A field program detected direct “crossover” of Scotian Shelf Water (SSC) from Browns to Georges Bank during winter/spring 1999 using (1) moored measurements, (2) drogued drifters, and (3) satellite imagery. Statistics of the 30‐day trajectories indicate that (18, 55) ± 17% of the drifters crossed the (100, 200) m isobaths on Georges Bank. Transit times ranged from 2 to 26 days. Four of the drifters crossed onto the Northeast Peak (NEP) coinciding with the detection of Scotian Shelf Water at the central NEP mooring. These events are deemed “significant” because they serve to deliver particles from the Scotian Shelf directly to the gadoid spawning grounds on Georges Bank. Depths of the SSC layers lie between 15 and 50 m, and “residence times” for the Scotian Shelf Water on the NEP are estimated at 3 to 4 weeks. Canonical correlation analysis of the NEP temperature and salinity records suggest that 10% of the correlation structure among the variables is related to SSCs, while 70% is associated with the annual cycle. A search for SSC driving mechanisms reveals that (1) interannual variability of the annual freshwater discharge from the Gulf of St. Lawrence is not a factor, (2) Ekman‐like response of near‐surface currents to southeast wind stress plays a role but is not the dominant factor, and (3) mesoscale baroclinic features penetrating Northeast Channel from offshore are the most likely cause. Furthermore, the incidence of SSCs may be related to offshore fronts whose proximity is positively correlated with the North Atlantic Oscillation index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207