MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064294200 · doi:10.7202/018752ar

Vingt-cinq ans de téléréalité

2008· article· fr· W2064294200 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luc Dupont

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La téléréalité a transformé l’univers de la télévision grand public. Dans ce texte, nous postulons que le phénomène de la téléréalité a connu une évolution en trois temps. La première génération de téléréalité emprunte à la fiction et au documentaire. On reconstruit la réalité à l’aide de témoignages, de reconstitutions d’événements et d’entrevues sur les lieux de l’événement. La téléréalité de la deuxième génération s’internationalise. Au lieu de reconstruire la réalité, on l’observe. La téléréalité de la troisième génération est interactive, multiplateformes et multimédias. On génère la réalité grâce à des émissions coupées et montées. En ce sens, la véritable originalité de la téléréalité d’aujourd’hui est à chercher dans sa façon d’utiliser les nouvelles technologies : Internet, vidéo, téléphonie cellulaire, lecteur MP3, radio et télévision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207