Two-photon absorption of styryl-quinolinium, -pyridinium, and -barbituric acid derivatives, and intramolecular charge transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of new chromophores, styryl-parent end-capped with various donors, and with barbituric acid, methyl-pyridinium, and methyl-quinolinium as the acceptors, have been synthesized and characterized by element analysis or X-ray diffraction. Using the Z-scan system, their two-photon absorption (TPA) cross-section values (δ) have been determined under excitation with 10 Hz, and 1064 nm, 35 ps mode-locked Nd:YAG laser pulse in DMF with do= 0.05 M. The effective δ value is as high as 10.9 × 1048 cm4 s per photon for trans-4-(4'-N,N-diphenyl amino) styryl-N-methyl quinolinium iodide (DPASQI). The δ value increases from barbituric acid- to pyridinium- to quinolinium-derivatives apparently due to the increase in both the conjugated degree and planarity; however, when the acceptor is fixed, the δ value increases from dialkyl amino groups to diphenyl amino groups even though the latter is a weaker donor than the dialkyl amino groups. Theoretical calculations confirm that the increased distortion from planarity for the barbituric acid derivative makes its δ value decrease. The relatively large δ value for quinolinium- or pyridinium-derivatives originates from larger intramolecular charge transfer, which can be characterized by the difference of dipole moment (Δµge) between the S0 and S1, and the transition dipole moment (Mee') between S1 and S2.Key words: two-photon absorption, intramolecular charge transfer, styryl-quinolinium, styryl-pyridinium, styryl-barbituric acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".