Effects of End-Group Balance on Melt-Phase Nylon 612 Polycondensation: Experimental Study and Mathematical Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of end-group balance and moisture level on melt-phase polycondensation reactions were investigated using nylon 612. The polycondensation reaction was determined to be first-order in amine ends and first-order in carboxyl ends at the relatively high temperature (284 °C) and low water concentration conditions (0−0.002 mass fraction) studied, which are encountered in the later stages of nylon polymerization processes. Using data from this study and the nonisothermal data of Schaffer et al. (Chemical Pathways and Kinetics of the Later Stages of Nylon Polymerization Processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2003; Experimental Study and Modeling of Nylon Polycondensation in the Melt Phase. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 2946), a mathematical model was developed that can accurately describe changes in both the polyamidation reaction rate and the apparent equilibrium constant, with changing water concentration and temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".