GW182 is critical for the stability of GW bodies expressed during the cell cycle and cell proliferation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel cytoplasmic compartment referred to as GW bodies was initially identified using human autoantibodies to a 182 kDa protein named GW182. GW bodies are small, generally spherical, cytoplasmic domains that vary in number and size in several mammalian cell types examined to date. Based on our earlier studies, GW bodies were proposed to be cytoplasmic sites for mRNA storage and/or degradation. In the present study, immunogold electron microscopy identified electron dense structures of 100-300 nm diameter devoid of a lipid bilayer membrane. These structures appeared to comprise clusters of electron dense strands of 8-10 nm in diameter. By costaining with CENP-F and PCNA, and employing a double-thymidine block to synchronize HeLa cells, GW bodies were observed to be small in early S phase and larger during late S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. The majority of GW bodies disassembled prior to mitosis and small GW bodies reassembled in early G1. The analysis of GW bodies in two experimental models of cell proliferation using reversal of 3T3/serum-starvation and concanavalin A stimulation of mouse splenocytes and T cells, revealed that proliferating cells contained larger, brighter, and more numerous GW bodies as well as up to a fivefold more total GW182 protein than quiescent cells. In vitro gene knockdown of GW182 led to the disappearance of GW bodies demonstrating that GW182 is a critical component of GW bodies. The incremental expression of the GW182 protein in cells induced to proliferate and the cyclic formation and breakdown of GW bodies during mitosis are intriguing in view of the notion that GW bodies are specialized centers involved in maintaining stability and/or controlling degradation of mRNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it