Pregnancy Outcome Following Exposure to Permethrin and Use of Teratogen Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NIX is a 1% permethrin creme rinse used for the treatment of head lice. There are no studies regarding human exposure during pregnancy. The primary objective of this study was to examine the safety of permethrin exposure during pregnancy. The secondary objective was to examine how teratogen information is perceived and used by women who requested information regarding this product. Women who had called the Motherisk and MotherSafe Programs to inquire about exposure to permethrin during pregnancy were followed-up to ascertain the outcome of their pregnancies. These women were compared with another group who had not been exposed to any known teratogenic drugs. Women who decided not to use permethrin were administered an additional questionnaire. We enrolled 147 women and completed outcomes on 113 pregnancies of women who had used permethrin some time during their pregnancy. There were 106 live births, six spontaneous abortions, one therapeutic abortion, and one major malformation in the women who used permethrin in the first trimester. The mean birthweight was 3540 +/- 492 g and the mean gestational age was 40 +/- 1 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between the exposed and comparison groups in any of the pregnancy outcomes. Of the 34 women who chose not to use permethrin and who completed the additional questionnaire, 18 (52%) did not use permethrin because they did not feel the information was sufficiently reassuring. The results of this study suggest that the use of permethrin products during pregnancy appears to be relatively safe because there was no increase in the rates of major malformations. We also found that some women will not use a product during pregnancy unless they can receive a 100% guarantee that it will not harm their baby.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".