Ejection of High‐Velocity Stars from the Galactic Center by an Inspiraling Intermediate‐Mass Black Hole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of young stars in the immediate vicinity and strong tidal field of SgrA* remains unexplained. One currently popular idea for their origin posits that the stars were bused in by an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole (IMBH) which has inspiraled into the Galactic Center a few million years ago. Yu and Tremaine (2003) have argued that in this case some of the old stars in the SgrA* cusp would be ejected by hard gravitational collisions with the IMBH. Here we derive a general expression for the phase-space distribution of the ejected high-velocity stars, given the distribution function of the stars in the cusp. We compute it explicitly for the Peebles-Young distribution function of the cusp, and make a detailed model for the time-dependent ejection of stars during the IMBH inspiral. We find that (1) the stars are ejected in a burst lasting a few dynamical friction timescales; if the ejected stars are detected by Gaia they are likely to be produced by a single inspiral event, (2) if the inspiral is circular than in the beginning of the burst the velocity vectors of the ejected stars cluster around the inspiral plane, but rapidly isotropise as the burst proceeds, (3) if the inspiral is eccentric, then the stars are ejected in a broad jet roughly perpendicular to the Runge-Lenz vector of the IMBH orbit. In a typical cusp the orbit will precess with a period of \sim 10^5 years, and the rate of ejection into our part of the Galaxy (as defined by e.g. the Gaia visibility domain) will be modulated periodically. Gaia, together with the ground-based follow-up observations, will be able to clock many high-velocity stars back to their ejection from the Galactic Center, thus measuring some of the above phenomena. This would provide a clear signature of the IMBH inspiral in the past 10--20 Myr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".