Performance of differential amplitude pulse-position modulation with RZ coding for indoor optical wireless links
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the performance of a differential amplitude pulse-position modulation with return-to-zero coding (DAPPM-RZ) over an indoor optical wireless channel. We compare the performance of DAPPM-RZ(A=2) with DAPPM(A=2), DPPM and DH-PIM. The result shows that, over a non-dispersive channel, DAPPM-RZ yields better power efficiency than DAPPM. It requires about 1.5 dB less transmit power. However, the bandwidth of DAPPM-RZ is double that of DAPPM. Compared to DPPM, the bandwidth of DAPPM-RZ is about the same as that of DPPM but DAPPM-RZ yields less power efficiency. When the number of bits/symbol(M) is above 3, the DAPPM-RZ is superior to DH-PIM_2 in terms of power efficiency but has less bandwidth efficiency. Over a dispersive channel, given the same value of M, DAPPM-RZ outperforms DPPM, DAPPM (without RZ) and DH-PIM<sub>2</sub> when the normalized rms delay spread is high.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".