Groupes dominants et structure locale de pouvoir à Deschambault et Saint-Casimir, Comté de Portneuf (1829-1870)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À compter de 1829 débute une réorganisation de la structure locale de pouvoir en milieu rural québécois. Cette réorganisation s'effectue dans le cadre d'une remise en question du pouvoir des élites traditionnelles, seigneurs et clergé. Au-delà de la lutte entre ces élites et la petite bourgeoisie locale montante, l'analyse de la composition sociale du pouvoir à Deschambault et Saint-Casimir suggère une rivalité entre le village et la campagne. La notabilité des commissionnés montre que ceux-ci se recrutent majoritairement parmi les élites villageoises. Pour sa part, l'élite agricole domine lors du choix des élus locaux. L'économie des deux paroisses trace cependant les limites du pouvoir paysan. Le groupe des marchands contrôle la mairie de Saint-Casimir, reflétant ainsi la dépendance de la communauté rurale de cette paroisse à leur égard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".