Effect of Hypoxia on the Distribution of Fishes Associated with a Petroleum Platform off Coastal Louisiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A combination of hydroacoustics and visual survey techniques were used to estimate the abundance, size distribution, and species composition of fishes at a petroleum platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The effect of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration on the density and distribution of fishes at this de facto artificial reef was examined. The techniques used permitted surveys of the entire water column, providing a more accurate reflection of the effect of a highly variable phenomenon (i.e., hypoxia) that may not be measured with traditional fisheries sampling equipment. Hypoxic conditions were observed during two of the five trips to the petroleum platform, South Timbalier 54. When hypoxia was present, fish density was dramatically higher in the strata immediately above the hypoxia. It was difficult to determine the exact impact of hypoxia on target strength (a measure of fish size), as the larger mean target strengths observed in the spring and summer may be due to seasonal factors and not to hypoxia alone. With the exception of the fall 1995 survey (which had significantly higher density and abundance estimates than other surveys), the estimated number of fishes did not vary among any of the sample periods. Even when 32% (15–22 m) of the water column was hypoxic (summer 1996), abundance estimates were slightly higher than in other survey periods without hypoxia (except fall 1995). While hypoxia reduced the availability of the water column to fishes, they concentrated where favorable DO levels were found. This included demersal species such as red snapper Lutjanus campechanus, which were found higher in the water column than expected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".