Sobrevivendo ao estigma da gordura: um estudo socioantropológico sobre obesidade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo a apreensão e interpretação de sentidos e significados que alunos obesos atribuem às práticas corporais de saúde realizadas no Projeto de Exercício Físico Adaptado para Obesos da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, no sentido de compreender os motivos que levam esses alunos a procurarem e a permanecerem no Projeto de Extensão. Trata-se de um estudo de caso de natureza socioantropológica situado no campo da Saúde Coletiva, cuja estratégia metodológica foi a articulação entre observação etnográfica (participante), entrevistas informais e formais (gravadas). Concluímos que atividades coletivas de indivíduos que partilham um mesmo estigma podem resultar em efeitos positivos para o grupo, na medida em que o encontro com os pares permite que vivenciem experiências construtoras de valores coletivos e cordiais, produtores de sentidos para além do desejo de emagrecimento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".