MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064509316 · doi:10.5515/kjkiees.2010.21.9.965

Effective Comb Type Pilot Assignment and PAPR Reduction in NC-OFDM-Based Communication System

2010· article· en· W2064509316 on OpenAlexaff
Dong-Geon An, Heung‐Gyoon Ryu, Seungjun Lee, Dong-Kuk Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingAutocorrelationTransmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Reduction (mathematics)Block (permutation group theory)MathematicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NC-OFDM(Non-Contiguous Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) 기반의 무선 통신 시스템은 많은 부반송파의 수로 인해 높은 PAPR(Peak-to-Average Power Ratio)을 갖는다. Comb type pilot은 시변 채널 추정에 있어서 block type pilot보다 낮은 계산 복잡도를 가지며 더 효율적이다. 그러나 CAZAC(Constant Amplitude Zero Auto-Correlation) 행렬 변환이 뛰어난 PAPR 저감 효과를 보임에도 불구하고, comb type pilot이 데이터 심볼에 삽입되게 되면 PAPR이 다시 증가하는 문제가 있다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 이러한 comb type pilot 배치로 인해 증가된 PAPR을 개선하기 위해 추가적으로 새로운 방식의 SLM(Selective Mapping)을 적용하였다. 또한, 본 논문에서 사용된 새로운 방식의 SLM 기법은 일반적인 SLM 기법과 달리, SLM의 선택 정보를 전송하기 위한 추가적인 대역폭을 사용하지 않음으로써 대역 효율을 높인다. 따라서, 본 논문에서 제안된 시스템은 제한된 주파수 대역을 이용하여 고효율의 데이터 전송을 얻을 수 있다. Because of a large number of subcarriers, the high PAPR(Peak-to-Average Power Ratio) is the major drawback of NC-OFDM system used for wireless communication system. Comb type pilot assignment is more efficient and lower computational complexity for the channel estimation than the block type pilot. However, even if the CAZAC(Constant Amplitude Zero Autocorrelation) matrix transform is used for the PAPR reduction of the data symbols, PAPR increases when the pilot is inserted in comb type with the data symbols. Therefore, in this paper, we additionally use a new SLM technique in order to lower the PAPR again even in the comb type pilot. Also, a new SLM technique suggested in this paper does not need any additional bandwidth for sending selection information for SLM. This combined method has good PAPR reduction performance and efficient data transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and ScienceSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207