MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064514861 · doi:10.1142/s021848850400317x

TEXTUAL-BASED CLUSTERING OF WEB DOCUMENTS

2004· article· en· W2064514861 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceInformation retrievalSchematicFuzzy clusteringDirectoryWeb pageHTML elementDocument clusteringData miningWeb miningFeature (linguistics)World Wide WebArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our study we presented an effective method for clustering of Web pages. From flat HTML files we extracted keywords, formed feature vectors as representation of Web pages and applied them to a clustering method. We took advantage of the Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm (FCM). We demonstrated an organized and schematic manner of data collection. Various categories of Web pages were retrieved from ODP (Open Directory Project) in order to create our datasets. The results of clustering proved that the method performs well for all datasets. Finally, we presented a comprehensive experimental study examining: the behavior of the algorithm for different input parameters, internal structure of datasets and classification experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it