MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064518201 · doi:10.1080/15325000490228388

Dynamic Voltage Restorer Cost Reduction in the Distributed Generation Environment

2004· article· en· W2064518201 on OpenAlexaff
Walid El‐Khattam, A. Elnady, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageElectric power systemDistributed generationConstructiveEngineeringReduction (mathematics)Voltage regulationElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Reliability engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringElectronic engineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deregulation trend stimulates engineers to reconfigure the electric system's structure and to establish new concepts for coordination among existing and new electric equipment. Recently, distributed generation (DG) has been introduced as a local power source for both electric utilities and customers. This article presents the positive and revolutionary impact of the existing DG in assisting the dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) in mitigating severe transient problems such as different types of voltage sags. It also consummates the union of two power devices, the DG and DVR, which have never interacted together in a power system before. With the introduction of DG into the system, the DVR's rating and cost are reduced. Digital simulation results are demonstrated to show the substantial impact of DG in stabilizing the system voltage profile and reducing the DVR rating. A brief cost analysis is introduced to emphasize the constructive impact of DG in reducing the DVR costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Components and SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207