MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064533932 · doi:10.1086/344599

Detecting Embedded Intermediate-Mass Stars Using Mid-Infrared and H [CSC]i[/CSC] 21 Centimeter Emission

2002· article· en· W2064533932 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. R. Kerton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsStarsAstrophysicsGalactic planeGalaxyAstronomyStar formationInterstellar mediumInfrared

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique is presented to detect distant, young embedded B stars (and possible clusters) from their imprint on the surrounding interstellar medium. H I 21 cm and 12 CO ( J = 1–0) line data from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey are combined with mid-infrared images from the Midcourse Space Experiment ( MSX ) Galactic plane survey to detect the photodissociation regions (PDRs) and molecular gas associated with the embedded intermediate-mass stars. The technique has been applied to a section of the Galaxy covered by the 12 CO Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory outer Galaxy survey (102 5 < l < 141 5, -3 0 < b < +5 4) and has led to the detection of 15 embedded intermediate-mass stars. The basic physical properties of the PDRs are presented and compared with PDR models. The PDR models, combined with previous observations of early-type Herbig Ae/Be stars and the nondetection of many of the sources in OH, H 2 O, and CH 3 OH surveys, imply that the objects are ∼10 6 yr old. The IRAS colors of the objects form a well-defined group and have been combined with 12 CO and MSX observations to identify approximately 100 additional IRAS sources within the survey area as possible embedded intermediate-mass stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207