A structural perspective on the enzymes that convert dTDP-d-glucose into dTDP-l-rhamnose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteria have a rich collection of biochemical pathways for the synthesis of complex metabolites. These conversions often involve chemical reactions that are hard to reproduce in the laboratory. An area of considerable interest is in the manipulation and synthesis of carbohydrates. In contrast with amino acids, carbohydrates are densely functionalized (each carbon atom is attached to at least one heteroatom) and this holds out the prospect of discovering novel enzyme mechanisms. The results from the study of the biosynthetic dTDP-L-rhamnose pathway are discussed. dTDP-L-rhamnose is a key intermediate in many pathogenic bacteria, as it is the donor for L-rhamnose, which is found in the cell wall of important human pathogens, such as Mycobacteria tuberculosis and Salmonella typhimurium. All four enzymes have been structurally characterized; in particular, the acquisition of structural data on substrate complexes was extremely useful. The structural data have guided site-directed-mutagenesis studies that have been used to test mechanistic hypotheses. The results shed light on three classes of enzyme mechanism: nucleotide condensation, short-chain dehydrogenase activity and epimerization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".