Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extraintestinal manifestations are common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), being reported in over 25% of patients. Ocular complications of IBD occur in around 10% of cases, but may precede systemic symptoms and are usually nonspecific. Complications of therapy, such as cataracts or glaucoma from steroid use or keratoconjunctivitis sicca related to 5-aminosalicylic acid medications, may also involve the eyes. The pathogenesis remains unclear, but factors such as the extent of intestinal disease, disease activity, and the presence of associated arthritis have been associated with ocular involvement. Conjunctivitis, episcleritis, scleritis and uveitis are by far the most common ophthalmic complications of IBD. However, posterior uveitis, intraretinal hemorrhages, vasculitis, choroiditis, optic neuropathy, and vaso-occlusive phenomena may also occur. The most frequent severe ocular manifestation is anterior uveitis (more common in women). It usually presents as a mild anterior nongranulomatous uveitis (60% of the cases). The inflammation in the eye and the inflammation in the gut are rarely correlated. Patients with uveitis, scleritis, and other anterior segment inflammation usually respond to steroids (topical, periocular or systemic). If the inflammation is resistant to steroids, or if appreciable steroid adverse effects are encountered, systemic immunosuppressive treatment should be considered; this is more likely in HLA-B27-positive patients with uveitis. Evaluation of the eye should be a routine component in the care of patients with IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".