Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper various extensions of the parallel-tempering algorithm are developed and their properties are analyzed. The algorithms are designed to alleviate quasiergodic sampling in systems which have rough energy landscapes by coupling individual Monte Carlo chains to form a composite chain. As with parallel tempering, the procedures are based upon extending the state space to include parameters to encourage sampling mobility. One of the drawbacks of the parallel-tempering method is the stochastic nature of the Monte Carlo dynamics in the auxiliary variables which extend the state space. In this work, the possibility of improving the sampling rate by designing deterministic methods of moving through the parameter space is investigated. The methods developed in this article, which are based upon a statistical quenching and heating procedure similar in spirit to simulated annealing, are tested on a simple two-dimensional spin system (xy model) and on a model in vacuo polypeptide system. In the coupled Monte Carlo chain algorithms, we find that the net mobility of the composite chain is determined by the competition between the characteristic time of coupling between adjacent chains and the degree of overlap of their distributions. Extensive studies of all methods are carried out to obtain optimal sampling conditions. In particular, the most efficient parallel-tempering procedure is to attempt to swap configurations after very few Monte Carlo updates of the composite chains. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that, contrary to expectations, the deterministic procedure does not improve the sampling rate over that of parallel tempering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".