MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064569834 · doi:10.1109/tap.2013.2291905

On the Equivalence of RWG Method of Moments and the Locally Corrected Nyström Method for Solving the Electric Field Integral Equation

2014· article· en· W2064569834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric-field integral equationDiscretizationMathematicsMultipole expansionMethod of moments (probability theory)Integral equationBasis functionCurrent (fluid)Mathematical analysisNyström methodAccelerationMatrix (chemical analysis)Representation (politics)Applied mathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first-order locally corrected Nyström (LCN) method for the electric field integral equation is modified to ensure continuity of the current between triangular elements of the mesh. Rao-Wilton-Glisson (RWG) basis functions are used to create a conversion matrix from the LCN representation of the current to the RWG method-of-moments (MoM) representation of the current in order to enforce continuity of current between adjacent triangular flat patches. Benefits of the method are two fold: first, it provides 4 × reduction in degrees of freedom and removes unacceptable error levels in first-order LCN implementations, second, the method can be viewed as a point-based discretization of the RWG MoM offering improved efficiency in its acceleration with the fast multipole algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it