MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064581920 · doi:10.1097/rhu.0b013e318188bea7

Voriconazole-Associated Myositis

2009· article· en· W2064581920 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria K. Shanmugam, Cal Matsumoto, Edward Pien, Jessica Rosen, Princy Kumar, Sean Whelton, Virginia Steen

Bibliographic record

VenueJCR Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsGeorgetown Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoriconazoleAspergillosisMedicineMyositisInflammatory myopathyInternal medicineDifferential diagnosisMyopathyRhabdomyolysisGastroenterologyIntensive care medicinePathologyDermatologyAntifungalImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent that is now the treatment of choice for invasive aspergillosis. Drug-induced myopathy has never previously been reported with voriconazole, although it is recognized with other triazole agents. We present a 34-year-old female African American renal transplant recipient, with a prior history of probable statin-induced myopathy, who developed severe generalized weakness with marked elevation of muscle enzymes and inflammatory changes on T2-weighted fat-suppressed STIR sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after commencing voriconazole for treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Her symptoms resolved and creatine kinase normalized upon stopping the drug. Given the increased use of triazoles in immunosuppressed and transplant recipients, it is important for rheumatology consultants to include this entity in their differential diagnosis of weakness in such patients. Voriconazole given for invasive aspergillosis in this renal transplant patient caused myositis that resolved with stopping the drug. Such triazole side effects can complicate the management of our immunosuppressed patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCR Journal of Clinical RheumatologySame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207