MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064604857 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2010.548618

A Theoretical Model for the Formation of Functional Micro- and Nano-Particles from Combustion of Emulsion Droplets

2011· article· en· W2064604857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulsionCombustionMaterials scienceEmulsified fuelVaporizationParticle (ecology)Chemical engineeringNanoparticleParticle sizeNanotechnologyComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a theoretical model is developed to simulate the process of vaporization and burning of emulsion droplets of a fuel and the evolution and formation of micro- and nano-particles. This process is usually known as the Emulsion Combustion Method (ECM). In the ECM, a proper salt solution is mixed with a fuel to form an emulsion of micro-solution droplets. The emulsion is then sprayed into micron-sized emulsion droplets; spray droplets burn in a spray flame to form final micro- or nano-particles. A mathematical model for the entire process from the droplet interior to the gas phase processes is proposed. Model equations are solved numerically. It is found that particle characteristics are dependent on the operating and processing conditions, such as the initial size and concentration of the suspended micro solution droplets in emulsion droplets and the fuel type and fraction of the emulsion droplets. Although a quantitative evaluation of the model performance is not yet possible due to the lack of sufficient experimental data, the developed model may be used to design an ECM process to produce particles with tailored properties. The main novelty of the model is that in an ECM process it can predict whether mono-dispersed single particles will be formed or agglomerated larger particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it