Hydrocarbon Liquid Phase Definition, Determination and Allocation in Two-Phase Hydrocarbon Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Identification of the produced hydrocarbon liquid stream, as either oil or condensate, in two-phase hydrocarbon reservoirs, gains special significance in cases where the gas cap and its associated condensate owners are different from the oil rim owners. Thus, the definition of the produced hydrocarbon liquid stream is critical in determining the allocation of the produced liquid phase and accounting for the volumes of oil and condensate produced to satisfy marketing constraints. In this paper we will discuss classification procedures of the produced hydrocarbon liquid stream, laboratory sampling and analysis, and compositional modeling demonstrated for a saturated oil reservoir with a large gas cap and a critical fluid reservoir. Introduction The definition of the hydrocarbon liquid stream and the characteristics of oil or condensate received significant focus in the petroleum literature. Appropriate sampling and conventional analysis of oil and condensate was discussed as early as 1941 by Flaitz et. al.1 and later in 1954 by Reudelhuber2,3,4. Eilerts et. al.5 in 1957 reported observed characteristics of a number of condensate fluids highlighting the wide range in physical properties and deriving "rule of thumb" to classify condensates based on gas-oil-ratio (GOR) and API gravity. In 1986 Moses et. al.6 discussed the characteristics of oil, near critical fluid and condensate, his work received significant discussion that advanced the understanding of the defining characteristics of the hydrocarbon fluid systems. A more detailed classification was presented by McCain et. al.7,8,9,10,11,12. McCain's classification identified color, API gravity and gas-liquid ratio (GLR) as defining characteristics of the produced hydrocarbon stream. Legal definitions and classifications were also adopted by various governmental agencies and are applied as references. Specifically, the Alberta Mines and Minerals Act 13,14 and the 1988 OPEC classification15. The significance of establishing an agreed criteria and procedure to classify and allocate oil and condensate production is realized in mixed ownership, where the owners of the oil and condensate are different. For mixed production situations, that will inevitably evolve during the development cycle of two-phase hydrocarbon reservoirs, present a challenge in determining the accurate allocation ratio of oil and condensate. We will demonstrate that appropriate periodic sampling and analysis of mixed producing wells provide the technical basis of validating compositional modeling techniques capable of component tracking permitting differentiation of liquid streams originating from the gas-cap or oil column. The procedure was applied to a saturated oil reservoir and a critical fluid reservoir and the results and specific technical challenges will be discussed. CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURES OF THE PRODUCED HYDROCARBON LIQUID Definition of produced hydrocarbon liquid stream as "condensate" based on surface determined properties was presented by Eilerts et. al.5 in 1957, observing that condensates range from very rich with a condensate-gas ratio (CGR) of 500 Stb/MMScf to very lean 10 Stb/MMScf with API gravities reported as low as 30 ° API to as high as 80 ° API. Based on the data reviewed, Eilerts et. al.5 observed that the API gravity of 85% of the samples reviewed ranges between 45 - 65 ° API, and quoted a rule of thumb for a gas condensate system to exist when the GLR exceeds 5000 Scf/Stb and the liquid is lighter than 50 ° API.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".