MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064644363 · doi:10.1159/000130851

The origin of the extra chromosome 21 in Down syndrome

2008· article· en· W2064644363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNondisjunctionBiologyMeiosisChromosomeGeneticsChromosome 21Down syndromeSatelliteEtiologyAneuploidyGenetic associationMeiosis IIInternal medicineGenotypeGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of fluorescence and other chromosomal variants were informative in 26 out of 72 families. Maternal nondisjunction was found in 19 and paternal in 7 cases. Satellite association studies of these parents and 94 controls from the same age group showed a highly significant increase in the satellite association index (AI) for chromosome 21 in the parents where the nondisjunctional event had taken place. The AI was also higher for chromosome 14. In addition, the parents who produced the normal gametes had significantly higher AI's for some acrocentrics than the controls. Exogenous factors increasing satellite association cannot be ruled out. The number of 21-21 association was significantly increased in the parents with nondisjunction in meiosis 1. The results indicate that satellite association may play a role in the etiology of Down syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it