MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064714617 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m611221200

Cholesterol Binding Does Not Predict Activity of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein, StAR

2007· article· en· W2064714617 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Y. Baker, Richard M. Epand, Walter L. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsSteroidogenic acute regulatory proteinCholesterolMutantCholesterol side-chain cleavage enzymeWild typePregnenoloneSterolBiologyChemistryBiochemistryMetabolismSteroidGeneGene expressionCytochrome P450

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) stimulates adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis by increasing the influx of cholesterol into mitochondria, where it is converted to pregnenolone to initiate steroidogenesis. StAR acts on the outer mitochondrial membrane where each molecule stimulates the mitochondrial import of several hundred molecules of cholesterol, but the precise mechanism of the action of StAR remains uncertain. StAR has a sterol-binding pocket that can accommodate one molecule of cholesterol. Direct assays show that StAR can bind cholesterol with stoichiometry approaching 1:1, and several disease-causing mutants with decreased or absent activity have correspondingly decreased cholesterol binding. We show that the StAR mutant R182L, which causes severe disease and is devoid of measurable activity in transfected cells or with isolated steroidogenic mitochondria, nevertheless, can bind as much [(14)C]- or NBD-cholesterol as wild-type StAR under equilibrium conditions and can transfer cholesterol between liposomes in vitro. Similarly, the artificial mutant S195A had 46.5% of the activity of wild-type StAR but bound cholesterol indistinguishably from wild-type. Competition assays showed that the rate of binding (t((1/2)on)) for R182L was only 36% of the wild-type and the rate of dissociation (t((1/2)off)) was 57% of wild-type, whereas the t((1/2)on) and t((1/2)off) for S195A and S195D were essentially the same for wild-type. These data indicate that cholesterol binding and transfer activities are distinct from its activity to induce steroidogenesis. StAR appears to act by other mechanisms in addition to cholesterol binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207