MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064714842 · doi:10.3928/02793695-20100730-02

Implications of an Aging Population for Mental Health Nurses

2010· article· en· W2064714842 on OpenAlexaff
Julianne Loge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthDementiaAffect (linguistics)Health careMental health carePopulationPsychologyPopulation ageingGerontologyNursingMedicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthDiseasePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapidly increasing numbers of older adults with dementia and other mental health problems throughout the world have huge ramifications for nurses who will care for these individuals, as well as for health care systems. This article explores some current problems in the health care systems and makes suggestions for better, more efficient ways to meet the growing mental health needs of the aging population. It also addresses moral-ethical dilemmas that will likely affect mental health nurses caring for this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health ServicesSame topicAging and Gerontology ResearchFrench-language works237,207