MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064714842 · doi:10.3928/02793695-20100730-02

Implications of an Aging Population for Mental Health Nurses

2010· article· en· W2064714842 on OpenAlexaff
Julianne Loge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthDementiaAffect (linguistics)Health careMental health carePopulationPsychologyPopulation ageingGerontologyNursingMedicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthDiseasePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapidly increasing numbers of older adults with dementia and other mental health problems throughout the world have huge ramifications for nurses who will care for these individuals, as well as for health care systems. This article explores some current problems in the health care systems and makes suggestions for better, more efficient ways to meet the growing mental health needs of the aging population. It also addresses moral-ethical dilemmas that will likely affect mental health nurses caring for this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health ServicesSame topicAging and Gerontology ResearchFrench-language works237,207