MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064719296 · doi:10.1109/iccie.2009.5223744

A new mathematical approach in integration of activity-based costing information in supply chain order management

2009· article· en· W2064719296 on OpenAlexaff
Amir H. Khataie, Akif Asil Bulgak, Juan J. Segovia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOperations Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivity-based costingProfitability indexSupply chainProfit (economics)Computer scienceSupply chain managementInteger programmingOperations researchProduct cost managementOrder (exchange)Risk analysis (engineering)Mathematical optimizationNew product developmentBusinessEngineeringProduct lifecycleMathematicsEconomicsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Available-to-promise (ATP) is a very important and critical supply chain management concept. Its purpose is to treat the actual and potential demands in a way for a company to obtain the largest possible profit. Optimization is a tool that can help in this subject and provides a reliable decision based on the availability of the production resources and the profitability of the products orders. Activity-based costing (ABC) increases the accuracy of the estimation of the profit that each product or order yields through the proper assignment of the overhead costs. This study presents a pull-based ATP optimization model to manage the actual orders effectively through the integration of ABC and mixed integer programming (MIP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOperations Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207