Geochemical and Geological Characterisation of the Duvernay and Muskwa Formations in Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ERCB/AGS has collected over 270 core samples from the Duvernay and Muskwa formations in Alberta and run a series of tests to characterize the formation for resource assessment. The geochemical and geological tests include adsorption isotherm, Rock-Eval/TOC, XRD whole rock and clay mineralogy, permeameter, porosimetry, thin section analysis and SEM imaging. The purpose of this talk is to discuss the regional geological and geochemical attributes of the Duvernay and to a lesser extent the Muskwa leading to a shale gas resource assessment. An important aspect of our study is that the samples wer taken to represent a variety of lithofacies and colour variations, for example, and do not necessarily represent the best reservoi rocks. Our purpose is to reveal the attributes of rocks that have resource potential, or lack thereof, as opposed to identifying rocks with reservoir potential. The data will be presented using a series of maps and sections to show the spatial and temporal variations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".