MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064831349 · doi:10.1159/000200720

Effects of Pirenzepine on Acute Mucosal Erosions, Gastric Acid and Mucosal Blood Flow in the Spinal Rat Stomach

2009· article· en· W2064831349 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersFondation de l'Hôpital général juifHospital Research Foundation
KeywordsPirenzepineStomachMedicineGastric mucosaInternal medicineMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorBlood flowGastric acidAntagonistGastroenterologyEndocrinologyPharmacologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of varying doses of pirenzepine, a selective muscarinic subtype M1 antagonist, on the prevention of acute gastric mucosal lesions in male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to spinal cord section at the C7 level. It was also intended to evaluate the effects of the drug on gastric acid output and gastric mucosal blood flow. Pirenzepine 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg every 2 h all caused a significant reduction in mean total ulcer length (p less than 0.01) compared to controls. This was associated with a significant decrease in acid output (p less than 0.05). There was no significant effect on gastric mucosa blood flow as measured by hydrogen gas clearance. These results indicate that the protective effects of pirenzepine on gastric mucosa, in the spinal rat model, are associated with the acid-inhibitory action of the drug and not on mucosal blood flow effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it