MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064847473 · doi:10.1142/s0219691307001902

STEREO MATCHING USING THE DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM

2007· article· en· W2064847473 on OpenAlexaff
Haiying Liu, Prabir Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceStationary wavelet transformWavelet packet decompositionLifting schemeSecond-generation wavelet transformWaveletWavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Matching (statistics)Computer scienceComputer visionHarmonic wavelet transformFeature (linguistics)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hierarchical stereo matching strategy using the Discrete Wavelet Transform. Both area- and feature-based methods are combined into a single process by the discrete wavelet decomposition. Experiments show that the method is accurate, fast, and robust to noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207