Chicken infectious anaemia vaccinal strain persists in the spleen and thymus of young chicks and induces thymic lymphoid cell disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chicken infectious anaemia virus (CIAV) infection may induce immunosuppression and persistent infection. The use of vaccination in young chicks is still controversial due to its low immune efficiency. In order to verify the viral persistency of a vaccinal strain of CIAV and its associated-lymphoid cell disorders, 54 1-day-old specific pathogen free chicks were vaccinated (CIAV-VAC(®); Intervet, Millsboro, Delaware, USA) and haematologic examination, expression of viral VP3 gene, humoral response and phenotyping of lymphoid cells were studied in lymphoid organs at various times post vaccination (p.v.). No clinical signs were observed but light heteropaenia was detected in CIAV-vaccinated chicks. The VP3 gene of CIAV was detected by polymerase chain reaction in the thymus and spleen from day 7 until 28 days p.v. Thymic larger CD4(+)CD8(+) cells increased only at 7 days p.v. while smaller CD4(+)CD8(+) cells decreased after 14 and 28 days in CIAV-vaccinated birds. The CD4 expression, in contrast to that seen for CD8, decreased in thymocytes from the CIAV-vaccinated group. In the spleen and bursa, the percentage of CD8(+) cells increased at 7 and 28 days p.v. only, while CD4(+) cells decreased simultaneously. The vaccinated chicks also exhibited a higher number of splenic CD3(-)CD8(+) cells (natural killer cells). The anti-CIAV antibody responses, however, remained low in most vaccinated chicks and did not persist up to 18 days p.v. These results suggest that the vaccinal virus strain is clinically attenuated but persists in the thymus and spleen in some birds, inducing a low humoral immune response and altering thymopoiesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".