A 39-kb Sequence Around a Blackbird Mhc Class II Gene: Ghost of Selection Past and Songbird Genome Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To gain an understanding of the evolution and genomic context of avian major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) genes, we sequenced a 38.8-kb Mhc-bearing cosmid insert from a red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). The DNA sequence, the longest yet retrieved from a bird other than a chicken, provides a detailed view of the process of gene duplication, divergence, and degeneration ("birth and death") in the avian Mhc, as well as a glimpse into major noncoding features of a songbird genome. The peptide-binding region (PBR) of the single Mhc class II B gene in this region, Agph-DAB2, is almost devoid of polymorphism, and a still-segregating single-base-pair deletion and other features suggest that it is nonfunctional. Agph-DAB2 is estimated to have diverged about 40 MYA from a previously characterized and highly polymorphic blackbird Mhc gene, Aph-DAB1, and is therefore younger than most mammalian Mhc paralogs and arose relatively late in avian evolution. Despite its nonfunctionality, Agph-DAB2 shows very high levels of nonsynonymous divergence from Agph-DAB1 and from reconstructed ancestral sequences in antigen-binding PBR codons-a strong indication of a period of adaptive divergence preceding loss of function. We also found that the region sequenced contains very few other unambiguous genes, a partial Mhc- class II gene fragment, and a paucity of simple-sequence and other repeats. Thus, this sequence exhibits some of the genomic streamlining expected for avian as compared with mammalian genomes, but is not as densely packed with functional genes as is the chicken Mhc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".