MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064887308 · doi:10.1080/07060660009501161

Fusarium head blight pathogens isolated from fusarium-damaged kernels of wheat in western Canada, 1993 to 1998

2000· article· en· W2064887308 on OpenAlex
R. M. Clear, Susan K. Patrick

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusariumAnthesisBiologyLimitingCropBiological dispersalAgronomyBotanyHorticultureCultivarDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Survey results from 1993 to 1998 for fungi isolated from fusarium-damaged kernels of wheat are presented. There is compelling evidence that Fusarium graminearum has recently been spreading westward from southeastern Manitoba, replacing less pathogenic Fusarium species as the principal fusarium head blight (FHB) pathogen. This movement has been accompanied by increasing economic losses from the effects of FHB. Environmental factors such as a lower average daily temperature in June and July may be influential in limiting the damage from F. graminearum in the western prairies, where F. graminearum currently is rare. However, precipitation levels at anthesis equal to those in the areas presently affected by economic levels of FHB occur in many western crop districts, suggesting that precipitation levels during the period of anthesis will likely promote further westward spread of this pathogen. The potential role of infected seed as a mechanism for long-distance dispersal of F. graminearum is considered

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it