MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064899547 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m512630200

Importin-β Mediates Cdc7 Nuclear Import by Binding to the Kinase Insert II Domain, Which Can Be Antagonized by Importin-α

2006· article· en· W2064899547 on OpenAlexaff
Byung Ju Kim, Hoyun Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversitySudbury Regional HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImportinNuclear transportNuclear localization sequenceCell biologyBiologyChemistryBiochemistryCell nucleusCytoplasm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the nuclear import mechanism of Cdc7, which is essential for the initiation of DNA replication. Here we report that importin-beta binds directly to Cdc7 via the Kinase Insert II domain, promoting its nuclear import. Although both importin-alpha and -beta bind to Cdc7 via the Kinase Insert II domain in a mutually independent manner, the binding affinity of Cdc7 for importin-beta is approximately 10 times higher than for importin-alpha at low protein concentrations of an equimolar ratio. Immunodepletion of importin-beta, but not importin-alpha, abrogates Cdc7 nuclear import, and the addition of importin-beta to the importin-depleted cytosol restores Cdc7 nuclear import. Furthermore, transduction of anti-importin-beta, but not anti-importin-alpha antibodies, into live cells inhibits Cdc7 nuclear import. Unexpectedly, we found that Cdc7 nuclear import is inhibited by competitive binding of importin-alpha to Cdc7. Further studies by site-directed mutagenesis suggest that Lys306 and Lys309 within the Kinase Insert II domain are critical for Cdc7 nuclear localization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207