MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064900660 · doi:10.1096/fj.06-5989fje

Leptin signaling in neurotensin neurons involves STAT, MAP kinases ERK1/2, and p38 through c‐Fos and ATF1

2006· article· en· W2064900660 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Cui, Fang Cai, Denise D. Belsham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptinPhosphorylationBiologyMAPK/ERK pathwayCell biologySignal transductionEnergy homeostasisp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasesNeurotensinInternal medicineEndocrinologyLeptin receptorNeuropeptide Y receptorNeuropeptideReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adipokine leptin signals energy status to the hypothalamus, which triggers a network of neuropeptide responses. Each hypothalamic cell type expresses a unique complement of neuropeptides, receptors, and second messengers; thus each likely responds specifically to peripheral hormones. We describe here the analysis of leptin signaling in a clonal population of mouse neurotensin (NT) -expressing hypothalamic neurons, N-39. Leptin induced phosphorylation of STAT3 and MAPK ERK1/2, but not the downstream effector of PI3K, Akt, and also induced c-Fos protein. We found activation of p38 MAPK by leptin, accompanied by phosphorylation of its downstream effector ATF-1. Phosphorylation of ATF-1 is blocked by the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB 203580. We linked this signaling directly to NT transcription. Protein binding analysis indicates that both ATF-1 and c-Fos are capable of binding to the mouse NT/N gene predominantly at physiological or high concentrations of leptin. The evidence indicates activation of distinct leptin signal transduction pathways that directly result in changes in NT gene expression and links these specific neurons to the control of energy homeostasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207