MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064976688 · doi:10.1117/12.775859

Improving multiple target tracking in structured environments using velocity priors

2008· article· en· W2064976688 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rohan Loveland, Edward Rosten, Reid Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Arizona
KeywordsComputer scienceFrame (networking)Tracking (education)Prior probabilityComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMatching (statistics)HistogramScale (ratio)DetectorPoint (geometry)Point set registrationTrack (disk drive)Data miningImage (mathematics)MathematicsGeographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an algorithm for determining a velocity probability distribution prior from low frame rate aerial video of an urban area, and show how this may be used to aid in the multiple target tracking problem, as well as to provide a foundation for the automated classification of urban transportation infrastructure. The algorithm used to develop the prior is based on using a generic interest point detector to find automobile candidate locations, followed by a series of filters based on scale and motion to reduce the number of false alarms. The remaining locations are then associated between frame pairs using a simple matching algorithm, and the corresponding tracks are then used to build up velocity histograms in the areas that are moved through between the track endpoints. The algorithm is tested on a dataset taken over urban Tucson, AZ. The results demonstrate that the velocity probability distribution prior can be used to infer a variety of information about road lane directions, speed limits, etc..., as well as providing a means of describing environmental knowledge about traffic rules that can be used in tracking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207