MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064998652 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2012.0402n

Three‐Dimensional Investigation of Petrocalcic Materials: Insight into Pedogenic Processes and Future Applications

2013· article· en· W2064998652 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amy L. Brock-Hon, Thomas R. Elliot

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsPedogenesisGeologyMineralogyCarbonateSoil waterMaterials scienceSoil scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computed tomography (CT) imaging was applied to Mormon Mesa petrocalcic and related materials to observe the location, arrangement, and interconnectedness of void spaces and to visualize density differences that may define pedogenic mineral relationships. Density variations visualized by these scans reveal features that may result from long developed pedogenic processes within these unique soil materials. Voids are present as cracks (shown to interconnect three‐dimensionally), elongated spaces filled with unconsolidated materials, and oblate‐spheroidal shapes that appear to be associated with detrital carbonate clasts. Density variations viewed through CT imaging may show the products of mineral neoformation, mineral packing differences during crystal growth, and/or older, denser petrocalcic materials eroded and incorporated via subsequent recementation (pisoliths). Computed tomography scanning can be used to understand unique forms and processes that are vital to our understanding of dissolution/precipitation and other pedogenic processes at work in these mature petrocalcic soils. We encourage the application of CT imaging to similar soil materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207