MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065006532 · doi:10.1353/ces.0.0002

The Protestant Churches and the Resettlement of Japanese Canadians in Urban Ontario, 1942–1955

2007· article· fr· W2065006532 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
David Dowe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismEthnologyGeographySociologyReligious studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur les relations entre les églises protestantes et les Canadiens japonais pendant et après la seconde guerre mondiale dans le cadre de leur relogement forcé dans les conurbations du centre du Canada, tels que Toronto et Hamilton en Ontario. Alors que les études récentes se sont concentrées sur les déplacements sous la contrainte de ces derniers vers des zones rurales au Manitoba et en Ontario, il s’agit dans cet article de faire un pas de plus pour étudier ce qui pour beaucoup d’entre eux a représenté la dernière étape d’une relogement dans un contexte urbain. Ce qui est plus important, c’est de proposer une réinterprétation des relations entre les Canadiens japonais et la société canadienne pendant la seconde guerre mondiale. Les confessions protestantes, comme l’Église unifiée et l’Église anglicane du Canada, ont emboîté le pas aux intentions du gouvernement fédéral de voir les Canadiens japonais vivre géographiquement séparés les uns des autres dans les villes; mais il ressort d’une observation minutieuse des présences aux services religieux et de la fonction sociale des paroisses, que ceuxci surent se servir des églises à leurs propres fins, afin de maintenir et de renforcer leur communauté.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207