MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065048176 · doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.2.8

Possible Fictions: Blochian Hope in <i>The Scar</i>

2009· article· en· W2065048176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExtrapolation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUtopiaAestheticsSWORDMateriality (auditing)ArtDystopiaEmblemFantasyTRACE (psycholinguistics)NegotiationLiteraturePhilosophyArt historySociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miéville's The Scar is best understood as a novel that is utopian in form rather than in content. Through its portrayal of the community on Armada as the struggle to negotiate an always-shifting utopia, the novel keeps alive utopia-as-impulse and avoids the limitations of a rigid utopia-as-program, making it an idea example of the sort of fiction Jameson discusses in Archaeologies of the Future. Drawing on Ernst Bloch's ideas of the utopian trace, this paper argues that the images of the Possibility Sword and the Possible Letter in this novel are emblems of the need to keep the materiality of other possible worlds alive in this one, something also achieved by Radical Fantasy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it