MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065062931 · doi:10.1007/s13369-015-1583-3

A Physical Head and Neck Surrogate Model to Investigate Blast-Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

2015· article· en· W2065062931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArabian Journal for Science and Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsJuravinski HospitalOntario College of Art and DesignMcMaster University
FundersAccelerated Innovation Research Initiative Turning Top Science and Ideas into High-Impact Values
KeywordsShock tubeTraumatic brain injuryBlast waveShock waveIntracranial pressureShock (circulatory)Impulse (physics)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryMechanicsPhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) resulting from the exposure to a blast shock wave is a challenging problem due to the broad long-term neurological deficits on the victims. The blast-related injury is not only due to the prevalence of military conflicts, but also due to increase terrorist attacks and domestic/industrial accidents. Mechanisms of blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury (BImTBI) have been controversial for a long time and nowadays are one of the most attentive topics among the neurotrauma researches. A physical head and neck model (PHNM) equipped with a surrogate gel brain was developed, and its dynamic responses to a blast wave were evaluated using a predesigned compressed air-driven shock tube. The neck model was constructed and tuned to simulate the actual human neck stiffness. The history of intracranial pressure (ICP) at different locations within the brain was monitored with four miniature pressure transducers. The acceleration of the head as well as the brain model was recorded using two accelerometers mounted internally and outside the PHNM. The shockwave effects on the PHNM were examined at different distance orientations from shock tube exit. The PHNM was exposed to free-field blast tests with controlled reliable positive peak pressure (PPP). The ICP amplitudes/profiles and the acceleration results vary according to the PHNM locations and orientations with respect to shock tube exit. The most vital parameters of ICP wave profiles including PPP, positive phase duration, and positive impulse values were greatly affected by the PHNM locations/orientations from the shock tube exit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it