De la lecture à la bibliophilie : Villeneuve Publications ou l’édition artisanaleanglo-québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le présent article, l’auteure examine l’impact de l’édition artisanale etdes presses particulières sur les conditions de lecture des recueils de poésiepubliés par Villeneuve Publications, maison d’édition anglo-montréalaise en activitéde 1976 à 1987. Elle retrace l’histoire du phénomène des presses particulièresdepuis leurs origines en Angleterre jusqu’à leur inscription dans le paysageculturel canadien et québécois, et brosse un portrait de l’évolution et desactivités de Villeneuve Publications et de ses fondateurs, la poète anglo-québécoiseRobyn Sarah et l’imprimeur-typographe Fred Louder. Abordant le livre d’artiste sousl’angle de la bibliophilie et de la consommation de biens culturels, l’article amèneles lecteurs à réfléchir sur les liens qui unissent les qualités matérielles dulivre, sa lisibilité et sa valeur monétaire et symbolique. Enfin, l’auteure tracedes parallèles entre l’édition artisanale telle que pratiquée par VilleneuvePublications et par des imprimeurs canadiens-anglais et la tradition québécoise dubeau livre et du livre d’artiste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".