Protocol Violations in Community-Based rTPA Stroke Treatment Are Associated With Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) is an established treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The rate and type of protocol violations in rTPA use and their effect on patient outcomes in this setting are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine associations between protocol violations and outcomes in community-based rTPA use. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of stroke patients treated with rTPA in 10 acute-care hospitals in Indianapolis from July 1996 to February 1998 and assessed complications and outcome. Retrospective National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (on admission and discharge), Canadian Neurological Scale, and length of hospital stay were calculated. Appropriate use of rTPA was determined by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) protocol. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age, 66 years; 76% white; 56% men) were treated by general neurologists (70%), stroke neurologists (24%), or emergency physicians (6%). Mean times to hospital arrival, brain CT, and start of rTPA infusion were 44, 86, and 141 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality rate was 10% (4 intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], 1 cardiogenic shock). Complications were more frequent among patients with protocol violations (n=8) compared with those without all hemorrhages (75% versus 10%, P:<0.001), symptomatic ICH (38% versus 5%, P:<0.02), and ICH attributable to rTPA, occurring within 36 hours (38% versus 2.4%, P:<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NINDS protocol violations are relatively common and are associated with symptomatic cerebral and systemic hemorrhages. When the NINDS protocol is strictly followed, hemorrhage rates in community-based rTPA use are similar to those in the NINDS trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".