MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065155483 · doi:10.1080/10715760290021298

Regulatory Aspects of Coenzyme Q Metabolism

2002· review· en· W2065155483 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mikael J. Turunen, Ewa Świeżewska, Tadeusz Chojnacki, Gustav Dallner

Bibliographic record

VenueFree Radical Research · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaVetenskapsrådetCancerfonden
KeywordsMetabolismCofactorBiochemistryChemistryCell biologyBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of factors are involved in the regulation of the amount and distribution of coenzyme Q in cells and tissues. These factors modify preferentially the biosynthetic mechanism in order to keep up an optimal tissue concentration of the lipid. The amount of substrate provided by the mevalonate pathway is able to both up- and down-regulate the velocity of synthesis. At the translation level, regulation occurs by receptor-mediated ligand binding and appears most clearly upon treatment with hormones and peroxisomal inducers. There are a number of pathophysiological conditions when these mechanisms of regulation are modified and explain the decreased coenzyme Q tissue concentrations. It is of considerable interest to establish appropriate physiological, hormonal and drug-mediated conditions in order to counteract disturbed cellular functions caused by coenzyme Q deficiency

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFree Radical ResearchSame topicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effectsFrench-language works237,207