MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INFLUENCE OF POSTURAL POSITION ON CARDIAC OUTPUT DURING INCREMENTAL EXERCISE IN ENDURANCE-TRAINED ATHLETES

2001· article· en· W2065175611 on OpenAlexaff
Darren E. R. Warburton, Mark J. Haykowsky, H. Arthur Quinney, Derrick Blackmore, K. K. Teo, Dennis P. Humen

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineEndurance training

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent evidence indicates that the stroke volume of endurance-trained athletes may continue to increase throughout incremental to maximum exercise in the upright position. However, little is known about the effects of changes in postural position on cardiac function during incremental exercise in endurance-trained cyclists. Objective: To evaluate the effects of changes in postural position on cardiac function during incremental exercise in endurance-trained athletes. Methods: The cardiovascular function of 10 endurance-trained cyclists (Age = 26 ± 5 (SD) yr, VO2max = 68 ± 4 mL/kg/min) was evaluated during incremental exercise in the supine and upright positions (counterbalanced) using radionuclide ventriculography. Results: The athletes were able to increase their stroke volume during incremental to maximal exercise in both the upright and supine positions, in the face of a reduced time for diastolic filling. The percent changes in end-diastolic volume and stroke volume were greater in the upright position versus the supine position (P < 0.05). The increase in cardiac output throughout incremental exercise in both postural positions was related to changes in heart rate, myocardial contractility and the use of the Frank-Starling mechanism. Forward stepwise regression revealed that heart rate and end-diastolic volume were the strongest predictors of cardiac output throughout incremental exercise in both postural positions. Postural position had a large influence on the impact heart rate and end-diastolic volume had on cardiac output. In the supine position, heart rate and end-diastolic volume explained 63 and 33%, respectively, of the variance in cardiac output during incremental exercise. In the upright position, heart rate and end-diastolic volume explained 27 and 68%, respectively, of the variance in cardiac output during incremental exercise. Conclusions: Highly trained endurance athletes make use of the Frank-Starling mechanism throughout incremental to maximal exercise in the supine and upright positions. Postural position has a significant effect on the relative contribution of heart rate, myocardial contractility, and the Frank-Starling mechanism to the increase in cardiac output during exercise conditions. The relative changes in end-diastolic volume and stroke volume are limited during supine exercise in comparison to upright exercise perhaps owing to the impact of the pericardium on ventricular filling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207