Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fatigue is an extremely common complaint among patients with chronic disease. However, because of the subjective nature of fatigue, and the lack of effective therapeutics with which to treat fatigue, this symptom is often ignored by clinicians, who instead focus on hard, objective disease end-points. Recently, the symptom of fatigue has received greater attention as part of overall health-related quality of life assessments in patients with chronic disease. Furthermore, new methods are being developed to help quantify fatigue, and are being utilized more frequently in the clinical setting. Moreover, studies in patients and using animal models of disease have provided some insight into changes within the brain which appear to be linked to the genesis of central fatigue. This review focuses on fatigue in chronic disease and outlines possible mechanisms which may give rise to central fatigue in chronic disease. Moreover, methods for measuring fatigue and an approach to the fatigued patient are discussed. Hopefully, a broader understanding of this distressing symptom will lead to the development of specific therapies for treating fatigue in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it