MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065185666 · doi:10.1115/icone17-75717

Temperature Fluctuations in a CANDU Moderator Test Facility

2009· article· en· W2065185666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsBruce Power (Canada)Hydro-QuébecUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyancyInletMechanicsJet (fluid)VortexFlow (mathematics)AmplitudeThermalPhysicsInertial frame of referenceMeteorologyOpticsClassical mechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional numerical model of the CANDU Moderator Test Facility (MTF) is presented. The results show fluctuations in velocity and temperature. The thermal solution of the MTF model indicates that the buoyancy forces dominate in the inner core of the tank, whereas, the inlet jet induced inertial forces dominate the outer edges of the tank. The interaction between these flows forms a complex and unstable flow structure within the tank. The largest flow fluctuations occur outside the tube bank where the inlet jets continue to flow, and around the top of the tank where the two inlet jets impinge on each other. The high velocity gradients between the inlet jets and the surrounding slower moving moderator fluid generate small vortices with low fluctuation amplitude but high frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207