MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065185666 · doi:10.1115/icone17-75717

Temperature Fluctuations in a CANDU Moderator Test Facility

2009· article· en· W2065185666 on OpenAlexaff
Farzin Alexander Farhadi, Nasser Ashgriz, Marc Kwee, R. Girard, Y. Parlatan, Mohd Ali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsBruce Power (Canada)Hydro-QuébecUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyancyInletMechanicsJet (fluid)VortexFlow (mathematics)AmplitudeThermalPhysicsInertial frame of referenceMeteorologyOpticsClassical mechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional numerical model of the CANDU Moderator Test Facility (MTF) is presented. The results show fluctuations in velocity and temperature. The thermal solution of the MTF model indicates that the buoyancy forces dominate in the inner core of the tank, whereas, the inlet jet induced inertial forces dominate the outer edges of the tank. The interaction between these flows forms a complex and unstable flow structure within the tank. The largest flow fluctuations occur outside the tube bank where the inlet jets continue to flow, and around the top of the tank where the two inlet jets impinge on each other. The high velocity gradients between the inlet jets and the surrounding slower moving moderator fluid generate small vortices with low fluctuation amplitude but high frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207