MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065201125 · doi:10.2118/89035-pa

Controls of Coal Fabric on Coalbed Gas Production and Compositional Shift in Both Field Production and Canister Desorption Test

2006· article· en· W2065201125 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojun Cui, R.M. Bustin

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalbed methanePermeability (electromagnetism)CoalGeologyPorosityCoal miningNatural gas fieldPetroleum engineeringDewateringMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringNatural gasChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The production rates of coalbed gas wells commonly vary significantly, even in the same field with similar reservoir permeability and gas content. The compositional variation in produced gas is also not everywhere predictable, although in most fields produced gas becomes progressively enriched in CO2 through the production life of a reservoir, such as parts of the San Juan basin. In contrast, it is generally observed that the ratio of CO2:CH4 declines with time during field and laboratory desorption testing of coal cores. In this study, we investigate numerically the importance of coal fabric, namely cleat spacing and aperture width, on the performance of coalbed gas wells and gas compositional shifts during production. Because of the cubic relationship between fracture permeability and fracture aperture width (and thus fracture porosity) for a given cleat permeability, the production profile of coal seams varies depending on whether the permeability is distributed among closely spaced fractures (cleat) with narrower apertures or more widely spaced fractures (cleat) with wider apertures. There is a lower fracture porosity for coal with widely spaced fractures than for coal with closely spaced fractures. Therefore, the relative permeability to gas increases more rapidly for coals with more widely spaced cleats as less dewatering from fractures is required, assuming that the fractures are initially water saturated. Increase in cleat spacing from 0.01 to 10 cm significantly enhances the peak gas production and shortens the period to reach peak production. The main stage of gas production is controlled by equilibrium desorption of gas from coals due to the relatively slow changes in reservoir pressure. The enrichment of CO2 in the production gas with time occurs because of the stronger adsorption of coals for CO2 than CH4. However, during desorption of coal cores, CO2 desorbs more rapidly than methane because desorption rate is governed more by diffusion than by sorption affinity, and CO2 has much higher effective diffusivity in microporous coals than CH4. Therefore, during canister desorption, there is a rapid increase in CO2 concentration in the desorbed gas followed by a steady decline in CO2 concentration, in contrast to the progressive enrichment of CO2 in produced gas from wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207