Characterization of Binding of Leukotriene C4 by Human Multidrug Resistance Protein 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) is capable of actively transporting a wide range of conjugated and unconjugated organic anions. The protein can also transport additional conjugated and unconjugated compounds in a GSH- or S-methyl GSH-stimulated manner. How MRP1 binds and transports such structurally diverse substrates is not known. We have used [(3)H]leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)), a high affinity glutathione-conjugated physiological substrate, to photolabel intact MRP1, as well as fragments of the protein expressed in insect cells. These studies revealed that: (i) LTC(4) labels sites in the NH(2)- and COOH-proximal halves of MRP1, (ii) labeling of the NH(2)-half of MRP1 is localized to a region encompassing membrane-spanning domain (MSD) 2 and nucleotide binding domain (NBD) 1, (iii) labeling of this region is dependent on the presence of all or part of the cytoplasmic loop (CL3) linking MSD1 and MSD2, but not on the presence of MSD1, (iv) labeling of the NH(2)-proximal site is preferentially inhibited by S-methyl GSH, (v) labeling of the COOH-proximal half of the protein occurs in a region encompassing transmembrane helices 14-17 and appears not to require NBD2 or the cytoplasmic COOH-terminal region of the protein, (vi) labeling of intact MRP1 by LTC(4) is strongly attenuated in the presence of ATP and vanadate, and this decrease in labeling is attributable to a marked reduction in LTC(4) binding to the NH(2)-proximal site, and (vii) the attenuation of LTC(4) binding to the NH(2)-proximal site is a consequence of ATP hydrolysis and trapping of Vi-ADP exclusively at NBD2. These data suggest that MRP1-mediated transport involves a conformational change, driven by ATP hydrolysis at NBD2, that alters the affinity with which LTC(4) binds to one of two sites composed, at least in part, of elements in the NH(2)-proximal half of the protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".