MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065248017 · doi:10.4021//jmc.v2i3.178

Pancreatitis, Panniculitis, and Polyarthritis Syndrome Presenting With Gouty Arthritis: A Case Report

2011· article· en· W2065248017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chun‐Feng Lin, Ying‐Ming Chiu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatological and COVID-19 studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolyarthritisPancreatitisArthrocentesisArthritisPanniculitisGoutSynovial fluidAbdominal painGastroenterologyDermatologyInternal medicineSurgeryPathologyOsteoarthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pancreatitis, panniculitis, and polyarthritis (PPP) syndrome combined with gouty arthritis has never been reported in the literature. A 49-year-old male with a history of heavy alcohol abuse for at least 20 years, chronic pancreatitis, and gouty arthritis, presented with pain, swelling, and erythema involving the right thumb, right 4th metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, and left heel for one week. Following examination of the synovial fluid positive for monosodium urate (MSU) crystals, he was treated for gouty arthritis and the polyarthritis progressed. A skin biopsy revealed pancreatic panniculitis. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) also showed swelling of the pancreas with peripancreatic fat infiltrations. The secondary arthrocentesis was performed and the synovial fluid showed amylase 1,970 U/L, lipase 1,260 U/L, cholesterol 79 mg/dL, and triglycerides 78 mg/dL. We report this case to remind physicians that the first manifestation of PPP syndrome can be mistaken for gouty arthritis. doi:10.4021/jmc178w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicDermatological and COVID-19 studiesFrench-language works237,207